We should redirect the page to Flash_Player, and treat all the players in the same article (even if the non-Macromedia sections are all stubs). There are several other flash players (see SWF#Players). IMO, the reason this article sounds like advertising is because it considers only Macromedia's Flash player. I think the above discussion is missing the point. Lost Goblin 00:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC) Reply "the most sensible platform for delivering cross-platform software." is purely POV, and Flash is not available for dozens of platforms (which is a fact, not a POV). Perhaps ".very attractive platform." is a poor choice of words, but Flash really is the most sensible platform for delivering cross-platform software.
To me, the only notable exception to the supported platform list is Linux x86 version of version 8, but this is a very small amount considering that generally speaking, these computers are servers and are not running browsers, and that Linux boxes running browsers would be a very small minority of web browsers indeed (unfortunately). Additionally, we are talking about computer used to browse the web. Flash supports more platforms than any other runtime environment (to my knowledge). The Linux x86 version is not very mature and it is outdated (v7,0,61,0) (this may be true for other platforms too). Section "Supported Platforms" misses the point that Flash is not supported on many platforms such as Linux PPC, *BSD and others. Advertising language is used in the article:
0 kommentar(er)
